The mostly coherent, sometimes surprisingly relevant commentary of an amateur human being.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
MPAA's Chris Dodd publicly threatens congress in temper tantrum - Support the petition to launch an official inquiry
Bribe:
The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
The expectation of a specific voluntary action in return is what makes the difference between a bribe and a private demonstration of goodwill.
Chris Dodd, in the wake of shrinking support for SOPA / PIPA in Washington:
"Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake,"
Could this be an admission of bribery ?
It seems close enough that a reasonable person would understand Dodd's statement as a clear quid pro quo.
If you find the idea that our laws should be written for the highest bidder objectionable, you can take action on this at whitehouse.gov, where there is a petition to investigate Dodd and the MPAA for bribery.
I urge you to sign the petition - it is time that we said enough is enough. We all want vitality for business and the economy, but the United States of America is a Democratic Republic, not a Corporakleptocracy. The blatant purchase of legislation has to stop, not only in the entertainment business, but in all segments of industry. An investigation, even if unsuccessful, will send a strong message to lobbyists: You can tender favor, but you cannot buy legislation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please contribute to the discussion below! Comments are a -public- forum... moderated for relevance, but not censored for opinion or ideas.